EPICS Controls Argonne National Laboratory

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  <20112012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024  Index 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  <20112012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
<== Date ==> <== Thread ==>

Subject: 'Feature' of subArray record
From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 16:07:22 +0000
Hi,

I have a waveform record which retrieves data from 2 channels on a VME card upon the card generating an interrupt.  I then process this data into channel 1 and channel 2 via two subArray records.  Channel 2 data appears immediately following the channel 1 data in the waveform record and is of the same size.

subArray record 1 has INDX = 0, NELM = size of data (calculated from waveform.NORD/2 via calc record), MALM = 16384
subArray record 2 has INDX = size of data, NELM = size of data, MALM = 16384

The maximum samples that the VME card will generate is 16384 per channel.

When I am at my maximum number of samples, I only see 1 sample in subArray record 2,  INDX is truncated to MALM - 1 and NORD is 1.  As number of samples is reduced NORD increases.  It seems that I am only allowed to store (MALM - INDX) samples rather than MALM.

Should it not be the case that I can store the number of sample allocated in MALM?  Otherwise I will be allocating memory which I will never be using, in this case double the amount required in subArray 2 as MALM must equal (INDX + NELM) rather than simply NELM.

Clearly I can get the system operating by setting MALM sufficiently high in subArray 2, but it seems that MALM isn't quite doing what it would be expected to do?

Graham-- 
Scanned by iCritical.


Replies:
Re: 'Feature' of subArray record Tim Mooney
Re: 'Feature' of subArray record Andrew Johnson

Navigate by Date:
Prev: Re: epics on FreeBSD: broadcast problem Andrew Johnson
Next: Re: How to use asyn with linux-GPIB Rod Nussbaumer
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  <20112012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
Navigate by Thread:
Prev: RE: Message logging survey Elliott Wolin
Next: Re: 'Feature' of subArray record Tim Mooney
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  <20112012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
ANJ, 18 Nov 2013 Valid HTML 4.01! · Home · News · About · Base · Modules · Extensions · Distributions · Download ·
· Search · EPICS V4 · IRMIS · Talk · Bugs · Documents · Links · Licensing ·