Torsten Bögershausen <[email protected]> writes:
> Which kind of device are you using ?
I am adding support for an incremental counter from ADDI-DATA, using asynPortDriver.
Thanks for the feedack!
-Chris Ford, SLAC
________________________________________
From: [email protected] <[email protected]> on behalf of Torsten Bögershausen <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 10:52 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: asyn: what if a driver wants to force callbacks?
To my knowledge,
there is no update.
In our driver, we do it like this:
/* If not moving, trigger a record processing at low rate */
if (!nowMoving) setDoubleParam(pC_->motorPosition_, newPositionInSteps + 1);
setDoubleParam(pC_->motorPosition_, newPositionInSteps);
And I added a test case:
https://github.com/EuropeanSpallationSource/MCAG_Base_Project/blob/master/epics/test/500_DLY-STOP.py
Out of curiosity:
Which kind of device are you using ?
On 25/05/16 23:50, Ford, Christopher wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In 2015 there was some discussion on Tech-Talk about how to force a callback for a parameter that had not changed values.
> Mark Rivers suggested a work-around, as shown below.
> I wonder if anyone has an update on the situation since then? Has any other method appeared? Or did you have success with the work-around?
>
> Thanks,
> -Chris Ford, SLAC
>
> On16 Nov 2015 Mark Rivers writes:
>> If a driver wants to force a callback there is a method that does not require any changes to the base classes, e.g. exposing statusChanged_ as protected or adding a new
>> isMotorRecordnowFilterButAlwaysProcess_ flag. The driver simply needs to set a parameter to a different value from present and then back to its current value, for example
>> setDoubleParam(pC_->motorPosition_(position+1.);
>> setDoubleParam(pC_->motorPosition_(position);
>> callParamCallbacks();
>
- References:
- Area Detector question Jörn Wüstenfeld
- RE: Area Detector question ulrik.pedersen
- RE: Area Detector question Mark Rivers
- asyn: what if a driver wants to force callbacks? Ford, Christopher
- Re: asyn: what if a driver wants to force callbacks? Torsten Bögershausen
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
RE: archiver appliance vs. data browser michael.kenning
- Next:
RE: archiver appliance vs. data browser Schmeißer, Martin
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
<2016>
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: asyn: what if a driver wants to force callbacks? Henrique Almeida
- Next:
Re: Area Detector question bob dalesio
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
<2016>
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|