Has anybody produced a systemd unit file for running the caRepeater? I'm
sure it's trivial to write but it would be good to include a copy in
Base (the release process for 3.14.12.6 will be starting very soon).
Initially it seems that it couldn't be started using socket activation
since currently the code creates its own socket on TCP Port 5065 and the
systemd.socket docs say:
> Note that the daemon software configured for socket activation with
> socket units needs to be able to accept sockets from systemd, either
> via systemd's native socket passing interface (see sd_listen_fds(3)
> for details) or via the traditional inetd(8)-style socket passing
> (i.e. sockets passed in via standard input and output, using
> StandardInput=socket in the service file).
It should be possible to extend the CA Repeater client with an option to
accept an open socket, but I don't know how much work that would
involve, and it would have to be a 3.16 feature anyway.
Ralph,
Should Base include unit files for starting IOCs? I'm not sure if we'd
want one for procServ and another using GNU screen, or if the latter
would need a wrapper script anyway.
- Andrew
On 06/27/2016 09:38 AM, Konrad, Martin wrote:
> Hi all,
> Niklas and Stefani, thanks for sharing your systemd unit configuration.
> It came just at the right time :-) I put together a similar one. Using
> the foreground option (-f) of procServ is the recommended way with
> systemd. My unit configuration [1] differs in some details:
>
>> ConditionFileIsExecutable=/usr/bin/procServ
>> ConditionFileIsExecutable=/usr/local/ops/iocBoot/ioccontrol/st.cmd
> This causes systemd to silently skip the service if one of these files
> is not executable. Stefani, are you sure that's the behavior you want? I
> would prefer it to fail with an error message instead (remove these two
> lines).
>
> I'm using "Restart=always" to make sure procServ is restarted
> automatically even if it exited cleanly. I don't want users to find out
> that they are not able to restart procServ after they shut it down by
> pressing Ctrl-Q.
>
> Note how systemd makes our life as developers easier: Daemons don't need to
> - fork
> - write PID files
> - drop privileges by themselves
> Systemd takes care of all these things for us :-)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Martin
>
> [1]
> https://stash.nscl.msu.edu/projects/DEPLOY/repos/puppet_module_epics_softioc/browse/templates/etc/systemd/system/ioc.service
>
--
Arguing for surveillance because you have nothing to hide is no
different than making the claim, "I don't care about freedom of
speech because I have nothing to say." -- Edward Snowdon
- References:
- IOCs under procServ as system services under systemd? Ralph Lange
- Re: IOCs under procServ as system services under systemd? Niklas Claesson
- Re: IOCs under procServ as system services under systemd? Konrad, Martin
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: IOCs under procServ as system services under systemd? Konrad, Martin
- Next:
Re: question of data conversion Ralph Lange
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
<2016>
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: IOCs under procServ as system services under systemd? Konrad, Martin
- Next:
Re: IOCs under procServ as system services under systemd? Konrad, Martin
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
<2016>
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|