Argonne National Laboratory

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  <20192020  Index 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  <20192020 
<== Date ==> <== Thread ==>

Subject: Fwd: Beckhoff BK9000 support survey
From: Mark Rivers via Tech-talk <tech-talk@aps.anl.gov>
To: "tech-talk@aps.anl.gov" <tech-talk@aps.anl.gov>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 03:11:55 +0000
Forgot to CC tech-talk.


Begin forwarded message:

From: Mark Rivers <rivers@cars.uchicago.edu<mailto:rivers@cars.uchicago.edu>>
Date: June 26, 2019 at 9:26:10 PM EDT
To: "Dunning, Michael" <mdunning@slac.stanford.edu<mailto:mdunning@slac.stanford.edu>>
Subject: Re: Beckhoff BK9000 support survey

Take a look at the new asynPortDriver branch of the Modbus module. It may provide an improved approach for the second version.

Mark


Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 26, 2019, at 8:18 PM, Dunning, Michael via Tech-talk <tech-talk@aps.anl.gov<mailto:tech-talk@aps.anl.gov>> wrote:

At SLAC we use Beckhoff bus terminals quite extensively because they
are inexpensive and reliable, but unfortunately don't yet have a
common epics support solution.  We have at least three versions of
support which were developed independently.

One version uses only the epics modbus module.  This has no driver so
requires less maintenance, but makes setting up IOCs more time
consuming and results in a lot of code duplication.

Another version uses asynPortDriver and some custom modbus code.  This
is designed to make setting up IOCs easier, but requires maintenance
of the driver code.

Another uses custom epics device support.  This requires writing
device support for each bus terminal, and has resulted in a pretty
ugly codebase.  This is our least favored solution going forward.

A typical installation would be a BK9000 bus coupler plus several
analog and/or digital I/O modules (e.g. KL2114, KL1104, KL3172,
KL3314), communicating over ethernet using Modbus TCP.

Before we settle on a solution, we'd like to see what everyone else is
doing.  Any responses would be helpful.

Thank you,
Mike




Michael Dunning
SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
2575 Sand Hill Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
(650) 926-5200

References:
Beckhoff BK9000 support survey Dunning, Michael via Tech-talk

Navigate by Date:
Prev: Re: Running EPICS R3.14.12.7 in RTEMS 4.11 Michael Davidsaver via Tech-talk
Next: Re: Running EPICS R3.14.12.7 in RTEMS 4.11 emilio.perez-juarez--- via Tech-talk
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  <20192020 
Navigate by Thread:
Prev: Beckhoff BK9000 support survey Dunning, Michael via Tech-talk
Next: Re: Beckhoff BK9000 support survey Davide Marcato via Tech-talk
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  <20192020 
ANJ, 27 Jun 2019 Valid HTML 4.01! · Home · News · About · Base · Modules · Extensions · Distributions · Download ·
· Search · EPICS V4 · IRMIS · Talk · Bugs · Documents · Links · Licensing ·