Phi,
I see a number of problems with the database:
1. The SCAN field of the $(P) motor should be "Passive", not "PASSIVE"
-- this causes an error but is not the source of the problem.
2. The $(P) motor isn't setting RTRY, so the number of retries is
defaulting to 10. If you set RTRY to 0, the outboard, inboard, and
downstream motors will only be moved once, instead of what appears to be
in a loop.
3. The $(P) motor's OUT field is writing the motor's TARGET position to
the $(P)-F fanout, but the $(P)-F fanout is writing to the output,
inboard, and downstream motor's RLV field, but it should be outputting
to their VAL fields.
If all the motors are at zero and the virtual motor does a relative move
of any distance, the move should complete successfully because an
absolute move and a relative move are the same, when starting from zero.
If the real motors have non-zero positions, requesting a 1mm relative
move of the virtual motor, commands a relative move of the real motors
with a magnitude of 1mm plus the virtual motor's current position.
If the virtual motor has a non-zero number of retries, the motor record
does a retry at the end of the move because the readback position of the
virtual motor doesn't match the desired target position.
Kevin
On 11/9/23 12:58, Tran, Phi Dung wrote:
Hi Kevin,
Here is the result.
If I caput my virtual motor $(P) by 1 then $(P)-F will fanout to my
three real motors. The three motors move by 1 and their X.Mtr.VAL is at
1. If I repeat caput by 1 many times to my virtual motor, the three
real motor VAL remains at 1.
However when I caput 2 to my virtual motor, the three motors moved to
20.1 mm.
Here is the output,
[ptran1@xf19id2-ws3 ~]$ caput XF:19IDC-ES-G0{Ymove}Mtr.TPRO 1
Old : XF:19IDC-ES-G0{Ymove}Mtr.TPRO0
New : XF:19IDC-ES-G0{Ymove}Mtr.TPRO1
[ptran1@xf19id2-ws3 ~]$ caput XF:19IDC-ES-G0{Ymove}Mtr-F.TPRO 1
Old : XF:19IDC-ES-G0{Ymove}Mtr-F.TPRO 0
New : XF:19IDC-ES-G0{Ymove}Mtr-F.TPRO 1
_Input 1, caput XF:19IDC-ES-G0{Ymove}Mtr 1, all three real motors moved
to 1_
ca:ptran1 at xf19id2-ws3.nsls2.bnl.local: dbProcess of
'XF:19IDC-ES-G0{Ymove}Mtr'
ca:ptran1 at xf19id2-ws3.nsls2.bnl.local: dbProcess of
'XF:19IDC-ES-G0{Ymove}Mtr-F'
CAC-event: dbProcess of 'XF:19IDC-ES-G0{Ymove}Mtr'
…. Multiple repeat of CAC-event: dbProcess of 'XF:19IDC-ES-G0{Ymove}Mtr'
….
scanOnce: dbProcess of 'XF:19IDC-ES-G0{Ymove}Mtr-DMOV'
CAC-event: dbProcess of 'XF:19IDC-ES-G0{Ymove}Mtr'
scanOnce: dbProcess of 'XF:19IDC-ES-G0{Ymove}Mtr-DMOV'
CAC-event: dbProcess of 'XF:19IDC-ES-G0{Ymove}Mtr'
scanOnce: dbProcess of 'XF:19IDC-ES-G0{Ymove}Mtr-DMOV'
CAC-event: dbProcess of 'XF:19IDC-ES-G0{Ymove}Mtr'
CAC-event: dbProcess of 'XF:19IDC-ES-G0{Ymove}Mtr'
_Input2, caput XF:19IDC-ES-G0{Ymove}Mtr 1, all 3 real motors previously
at 1, they remained at 1 and all_
_Subsequent input of 1 will not move the 3 real motors and only
dbProcess is shown._
ca:ptran1 at xf19id2-ws3.nsls2.bnl.local: dbProcess of
'XF:19IDC-ES-G0{Ymove}Mtr'
_Input3, caput XF:19IDC-ES-G0{Ymove}Mtr 1, all 3 real motors previously
at 1, they remained at 1 and all_
_Subsequent input of 1 will not move the 3 real motors and only
dbProcess is shown._
ca:ptran1 at xf19id2-ws3.nsls2.bnl.local: dbProcess of
'XF:19IDC-ES-G0{Ymove}Mtr'
_Input4, caput XF:19IDC-ES-G0{Ymove}Mtr 2, all 3 real motors previously
at 1, they moved to 20.1_
_ca:ptran1 at xf19id2-ws3.nsls2.bnl.local: dbProcess of
'XF:19IDC-ES-G0{Ymove}Mtr'_
_ca:ptran1 at xf19id2-ws3.nsls2.bnl.local: dbProcess of
'XF:19IDC-ES-G0{Ymove}Mtr-F'_
_scanOnce: dbProcess of 'XF:19IDC-ES-G0{Ymove}Mtr-DMOV'_
_scanOnce: dbProcess of 'XF:19IDC-ES-G0{Ymove}Mtr-DMOV'_
_scanOnce: dbProcess of 'XF:19IDC-ES-G0{Ymove}Mtr-DMOV'_
_CAC-event: dbProcess of 'XF:19IDC-ES-G0{Ymove}Mtr'_
_…._
_CAC-event: dbProcess of 'XF:19IDC-ES-G0{Ymove}Mtr'_
_scanOnce: dbProcess of 'XF:19IDC-ES-G0{Ymove}Mtr-DMOV'_
_CAC-event: dbProcess of 'XF:19IDC-ES-G0{Ymove}Mtr'_
_scanOnce: dbProcess of 'XF:19IDC-ES-G0{Ymove}Mtr-DMOV'_
_CAC-event: dbProcess of 'XF:19IDC-ES-G0{Ymove}Mtr'_
_scanOnce: dbProcess of 'XF:19IDC-ES-G0{Ymove}Mtr-DMOV'_
_CAC-event: dbProcess of 'XF:19IDC-ES-G0{Ymove}Mtr'_
Thanks,
Phi
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Kevin Peterson <kmpeters at anl.gov>
*Sent:* Thursday, November 9, 2023 11:04 AM
*To:* Tran, Phi Dung <ptran1 at bnl.gov>; tech-talk at aps.anl.gov
<tech-talk at aps.anl.gov>
*Subject:* Re: second relative motion stuck in a do loop
Phi,
Are any of the motors (real or soft) doing retries?
How does the $(P)-DMOV record's behavior differ between the 1st relative
move, which succeeds, and the 2nd relative move, which misbehaves?
Kevin
On 11/7/23 22:23, Tran, Phi Dung via Tech-talk wrote:
Hi,
I am using RLV for relative motion with a soft channel. When I issue a
caput command with a value of 2 to my soft channel, $(P), to move the
other real motors, they move by 2 mm. However, when I repeat the caput
command with the value 2 to my soft channel for the second time, the
motors move by 7*2=14 mm instead of 2 mm. Please advise.
Thank you,
Phi
- Replies:
- Re: second relative motion stuck in a do loop Tran, Phi Dung via Tech-talk
- References:
- second relative motion stuck in a do loop Tran, Phi Dung via Tech-talk
- Re: second relative motion stuck in a do loop Kevin Peterson via Tech-talk
- Re: second relative motion stuck in a do loop Tran, Phi Dung via Tech-talk
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: second relative motion stuck in a do loop Tran, Phi Dung via Tech-talk
- Next:
Room temperature and humidity monitoring with EPICS? Jesse Hopkins via Tech-talk
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
<2023>
2024
2025
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: second relative motion stuck in a do loop Tran, Phi Dung via Tech-talk
- Next:
Re: second relative motion stuck in a do loop Tran, Phi Dung via Tech-talk
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
<2023>
2024
2025
|