EPICS Controls Argonne National Laboratory

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  <20242025  Index 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  <20242025 
<== Date ==> <== Thread ==>

Subject: Re: Adding additional fields to be archived in "policies.py"
From: Gerrit Kühn via Tech-talk <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov>
To: Timo Korhonen <Timo.Korhonen at ess.eu>
Cc: Michael Davidsaver via Tech-talk <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov>
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2024 12:09:28 +0200
Am Fri, 6 Sep 2024 10:34:52 +0000
schrieb Timo Korhonen <Timo.Korhonen at ess.eu>:

> > Maybe the plugin doesn't support this? In that case would could
> > probably fall back on creating an extra channel per device that
> > reflects the error status. Or would the first idea we had (simply
> > adding PVNAME.STAT explicitely to the archiver) work as well?  

> In the meantime, until the requested feature is available in the plugin,
> you can of course use your first idea. That should work, albeit with the
> caveats that I mentioned earlier (non-atomicity). Adding an extra
> channel (=record) should not be necessary.

We tried this meanwhile and added .STAT and .SEVR excplicitely to the
archiver. However, I'm not quite sure what to make of the result:
When unplugging the device, we get
.STAT TIMEOUT
.STAT 10
.SEVR INVALID
.SEVR 3

when using caget on the commandline. However, when looking into the
archiver data, .STAT changes from 0 to 1 while .SEVR stays at 0 all the
time. I would have expected 10 for .STAT and 3 for .SEVR as seen on the
commandline with caget.


cu
  Gerrit

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Replies:
Re: Adding additional fields to be archived in "policies.py" Timo Korhonen via Tech-talk
References:
Adding additional fields to be archived in "policies.py" Windsor Tanner via Tech-talk
Re: Adding additional fields to be archived in "policies.py" Michael Davidsaver
Re: Adding additional fields to be archived in "policies.py" Gerrit Kühn
Re: Adding additional fields to be archived in "policies.py" Timo Korhonen via Tech-talk
Re: Adding additional fields to be archived in "policies.py" Gerrit Kühn via Tech-talk
Re: Adding additional fields to be archived in "policies.py" Timo Korhonen via Tech-talk
Re: Adding additional fields to be archived in "policies.py" Gerrit Kühn via Tech-talk
Re: Adding additional fields to be archived in "policies.py" Timo Korhonen via Tech-talk

Navigate by Date:
Prev: Re: Help with rtems nfs mounting Knap, Giles (DLSLtd,RAL,LSCI) via Tech-talk
Next: The teck-talk mailing list seems to be unarchived Shuei YAMADA via Tech-talk
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  <20242025 
Navigate by Thread:
Prev: Re: Adding additional fields to be archived in "policies.py" Timo Korhonen via Tech-talk
Next: Re: Adding additional fields to be archived in "policies.py" Timo Korhonen via Tech-talk
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  <20242025 
ANJ, 11 Sep 2024 Valid HTML 4.01! · Home · News · About · Base · Modules · Extensions · Distributions ·
· Download · Search · IRMIS · Talk · Documents · Links · Licensing ·