Re: caget: Identical process variable names on multiple servers

["J. Lewis Muir via Tech-talk" <tech-talk@aps.anl.gov>]

On 11/10, Paul Sichta wrote:
> Lewis,

Hi, Paul!

Thank you for your reply.

> For the  "Identical PV" message:
> Is there a gateway on the 10.0.9 subnet that could be using ioc23 as a
> client?

No.  However, there is a CA gateway on 192.168.0.2, which is provided by
the APS, and which is listed in EPICS_CA_ADDR_LIST; ioc23 connects to
that for some PVs.  Could that be a problem?

(And of course, the strange thing is that this is very rare.  Out of
thousands of times running this command, it failed just this one time.)

> Your  10.0.9.255  is a broadcast.
>   0.0.0.2:5, is not in your ADDR_LIST,  so why is it answering your call?
 
Indeed.  And the same for 0.0.0.1:5.  I have no idea what that is.  The
0.0.0.0/8 network doesn't even exist on my infrastructure.

Thanks,

Lewis