doubles need %lf to printf.
Could that be your problem ??
#include <stdio.h>
int main (int argc, char *argv[]) {
double f=200.;
float *pf = (float*)&f;
printf ("%f\n",*pf);
printf ("%lf\n",*(double*)pf);
return 0;
}
./a.out
0.000000
200.000000
On 07/13/09 19:46, Allison, Stephanie wrote:
Hi Andy,
Peter didn't provide the full dbpr of the AO record (unfortunate) but assuming he has ESLO=1.0 (default), because he's using raw soft support and he has LINR set to LINEAR, RVAL is getting set to 200.
I tested his database on 3.14.8.2 (setting the sub to a calc) and saw D set to 200 as it should be. I wonder if his subroutine function is doing something bad like overwriting some record fields.
Stephanie Allison
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Andy Foster
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 4:35 PM
To: Dr. Peter Zumbruch
Cc: Epics Questions
Subject: Re: sub routine record doesn't get value via INPD
Hi Peter,
The "dbpf HAD:RPC:S1:M0:C9:ToTL 200" is putting 200 into
the VAL field of the AO record: "HAD:RPC:S1:M0:C9:ToTL"
rather than the RVAL field. Thus, the RVAL field remains at 0.0.
The OUT link from the AO record gets processed as a result of
writing to the AO record:
field(OUT, "HAD:RPC:S1:M0:C9:stToTL")
This link causes the "200" to be placed in the VAL field of
the sub record: "HAD:RPC:S1:M0:C9:stToTL".
The sub record INPD field is looking at the RVAL field of
the AO field which is still at 0.0.
Cheers,
Andy
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009, Dr. Peter Zumbruch wrote:
Hi all,
I have the following problem (EPICS 3.14.10 / Debian 4.0)
with this tiny database (minimized to my problem) .
Why don't I see the Value/Raw Value of "HAD:RPC:S1:M0:C9:ToTL" at the
input D of the sub record "HAD:RPC:S1:M0:C9:stToTL", which I try to
access at c-code.
1) The ingredients:
record(ao, HAD:RPC:S1:M0:C9:ToTL) {
field(DESC, "0 0 0 2")
field(DTYP, "Raw Soft Channel")
field(FLNK, "HAD:RPC:S1:M0:C9:stToTL")
field(OUT, "HAD:RPC:S1:M0:C9:stToTL")
field(EOFF, "0")
field(LOPR, "0")
field(HOPR, "199")
field(DRVH, "250")
field(DRVL, "0")
field(LINR, "LINEAR")
field(OMSL, "supervisory")
}
record(sub, HAD:RPC:S1:M0:C9:stToTL) {
field(DESC, "store 0 0 0 2")
field(INAM, "mySubInit")
field(SNAM, "myStoreFcn")
field(INPA, "0")
field(INPB, "0")
field(INPC, "2")
field(INPD, "HAD:RPC:S1:M0:C9:ToTL.RVAL")
field(INPE, "0")
}
The referenced C-Code:
static long myStoreFcn(subRecord *precord)
{
...
short thr;
...
thr = precord->d;
...
printf( "Record %s called myStoreFcn(%p), thr %d, precord->d %f\n",
precord->name, (void*) precord, thr, precord->d);
...
return(0);
}
...
epicsRegisterFunction(myStoreFcn);
...
2.) The test: (caput / dbpf)
epics> dbgf HAD:RPC:S1:M0:C9:ToTL
DBR_DOUBLE: 0
epics> dbpf HAD:RPC:S1:M0:C9:ToTL 200
Record HAD:RPC:S1:M0:C9:stToTL called myStoreFcn(0x80577b0), thr 0,
precord->d 0.000000
DBR_DOUBLE: 200
epics>dbpr HAD:RPC:S1:M0:C9:stToTL
A: 0 ASG: B: 0 C: 2
D: 0 DESC: store 0 0 0 2 DISA: 0 DISP: 0
DISV: 1 E: 0 F: 0 G: 0
H: 0 I: 0 J: 0 K: 0
L: 0 NAME: HAD:RPC:S1:M0:C9:stToTL SEVR: NO_ALARM
STAT: NO_ALARM TPRO: 0 VAL: 200
3. ) The (stupid) question: Why don't I get the value of
HAD:RPC:S1:M0:C9:ToTL at D? At VAL I see it.
Thanks for any explanation.
Peter
--
Dr. rer. nat. Peter W. Zumbruch
EE - department / Controls group / GSI
E-Mail: P.Zumbruch_at_gsi.de
Tel: +49-(6159)-71-1435 / Fax: +49-(6159)-71-2986
GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH
Planckstraße 1 / D-64291 Darmstadt / www.gsi.de
Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Darmstadt
Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Darmstadt, HRB 1528
Geschäftsführung: Professor Dr. Horst Stöcker, Christiane Neumann
Vorsitzende des Aufsichtsrates: Dr. Beatrix Vierkorn-Rudolph,
Stellvertreter: Ministerialdirigent Dr. Rolf Bernhardt
--
Matthieu Bec Gemini Observatory
Tel: +56 51 205785 c/o AURA, Casilla 603
Fax: +56 51 205650 La Serena, Chile
- Replies:
- Re: sub routine record doesn't get value via INPD Matthieu Bec
- References:
- sub routine record doesn't get value via INPD Dr. Peter Zumbruch
- Re: sub routine record doesn't get value via INPD Andy Foster
- RE: sub routine record doesn't get value via INPD Allison, Stephanie
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
RE: sub routine record doesn't get value via INPD Allison, Stephanie
- Next:
Re: sub routine record doesn't get value via INPD Matthieu Bec
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
<2009>
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
RE: sub routine record doesn't get value via INPD Allison, Stephanie
- Next:
Re: sub routine record doesn't get value via INPD Matthieu Bec
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
<2009>
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|