Hi Andrew
Am 05.03.20 um 19:58 schrieb Johnson, Andrew N.:
> What we want to do here is write a string to an input link field once
> at init time. Link fields can be written to only via CA, which is why
> we have to use a CA link.
>
> Do you have to wait until after iocInit to set the value of that
> input link field? If you could do it beforehand you could load a
> separate .db file that just sets the link field of that record. You
> can also use the IOC’s ‘dbpf’ command to write to a link field in
> your startup script, and the length of that string isn’t limited to
> 40 characters any more.
The only reason for the chosen design was to make the database more
modular. We have multiple instances of a template where each instance
corresponds to one device. It is not a priori clear how many will be
needed and perhaps even what the device names will be. But we also want
to calculate a summary status value for all devices together. The idea
was to let the device templates re-write the input links of the summary
calculation. In this way the summary status calculation does not need to
know how the devices are named and how many there are (up to a limit of
course).
> Christoph’s original example doesn’t show him writing to a link
> field, and I’m still a little confused exactly what you’re trying to
> do.
I hope I made that clearer now.
> Given the actual complexity of what you’re trying to do (as
> against the apparent simplicity that you’re wanting) I suspect using
> a sequence program might be simpler, but more detail of the actual
> problem might allow us to find a simpler solution.
Link re-writing may be a complex thing when viewed from the inside of
what has to happen on the IOC to make it possible. From a user
perspective, i.e. one who makes databases, it is not complex at all, at
least not until you wonder about the limitations and things not working
as you expect, and then listen to the explanations from the experts...
This is not a matter of not being able to achieve some desired effect.
It is more about how to do that in an elegant and modular way. Christoph
had this idea and I said "fine, why not, let's try that", which is how
we stumbled over the PINI/CA link problem.
Cheers
Ben
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Replies:
- Re: CA output links not working with PINI=YES? Johnson, Andrew N. via Tech-talk
- References:
- CA output links not working with PINI=YES? Christoph Schroeder via Tech-talk
- Re: CA output links not working with PINI=YES? J. Lewis Muir via Tech-talk
- Re: CA output links not working with PINI=YES? Christoph Schroeder via Tech-talk
- Re: CA output links not working with PINI=YES? J. Lewis Muir via Tech-talk
- Re: CA output links not working with PINI=YES? Ralph Lange via Tech-talk
- Re: CA output links not working with PINI=YES? Benjamin Franksen via Tech-talk
- Re: CA output links not working with PINI=YES? Johnson, Andrew N. via Tech-talk
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: Real-time IOC and systemd Benjamin Franksen via Tech-talk
- Next:
Re: CA output links not working with PINI=YES? Johnson, Andrew N. via Tech-talk
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
<2020>
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: CA output links not working with PINI=YES? Mooney, Tim M. via Tech-talk
- Next:
Re: CA output links not working with PINI=YES? Johnson, Andrew N. via Tech-talk
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
<2020>
2021
2022
2023
2024
|