EPICS Controls Argonne National Laboratory

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  <20202021  2022  2023  2024  Index 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  <20202021  2022  2023  2024 
<== Date ==> <== Thread ==>

Subject: RE: SoftIOC and Labview
From: Kathryn Baker - UKRI STFC via Tech-talk <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov>
To: "tech-talk at aps.anl.gov" <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 08:48:18 +0000

I don’t work for BESSY, but I am a LabVIEW developer as well as too many other languages by now, and I would choose CALab over the native implementations in LabVIEW. I hadn’t noticed a marked improvement in the EPICS implementations, but generally we don’t use it where I work.

 

If we are writing in LabVIEW and talking to something in EPICS, we use CALab. As is often the case it depends on the overall system what the best solution is, but for the problem description you gave, I’d go with CALab myself.

 

Regards,

Kathryn

 

From: Tech-talk <tech-talk-bounces at aps.anl.gov> On Behalf Of Ralph Lange via Tech-talk
Sent: 27 May 2020 08:36
To: EPICS Tech Talk <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov>
Subject: Re: SoftIOC and Labview

 

My 2cts - your mileage may vary:

 

The NI implementations of CA (client and server) were indeed getting better over time, but they started at a very low level of compatibility.

Their newest versions are pretty much working (at least for scalars), but - especially for their CA server - you are always in for some surprises, and your clients might need special configuration when talking to an NI Channel Access server.

 

I can just underline what Gabriel wrote: In my experience (which is obviously biased as I was working at BESSY for a long time), CALab is the most reliable, robust and stable CA client for LabVIEW.

(Doesn't just look better - it works better, too!)

 

Cheers,

~Ralph

 

 

On Wed, 27 May 2020 at 08:27, Gabriel Fedel via Tech-talk <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov> wrote:


I had the same problem with older versions of Labview. As soon I know
the waveform implementation on Labview is wrong, so you shouldn't trust
on it.

An alternative is CALab
(https://www.helmholtz-berlin.de/zentrum/locations/it/software/exsteuer/calab/index_en.html),
I've tried once and it looks much better than NI solution.

 

This email and any attachments are intended solely for the use of the named recipients. If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy or distribute this email or any of its attachments and should notify the sender immediately and delete this email from your system. UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) has taken every reasonable precaution to minimise risk of this email or any attachments containing viruses or malware but the recipient should carry out its own virus and malware checks before opening the attachments. UKRI does not accept any liability for any losses or damages which the recipient may sustain due to presence of any viruses. Opinions, conclusions or other information in this message and attachments that are not related directly to UKRI business are solely those of the author and do not represent the views of UKRI.


References:
SoftIOC and Labview Mostafa, Jalal (IPE) via Tech-talk
Re: SoftIOC and Labview Paul Sichta via Tech-talk
Re: SoftIOC and Labview Mostafa, Jalal (IPE) via Tech-talk
Re: SoftIOC and Labview Paul Sichta via Tech-talk
Re: SoftIOC and Labview Gabriel Fedel via Tech-talk
Re: SoftIOC and Labview Ralph Lange via Tech-talk

Navigate by Date:
Prev: Re: SoftIOC and Labview Ralph Lange via Tech-talk
Next: Strange problem with areaDetector driver Jörn Dreyer via Tech-talk
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  <20202021  2022  2023  2024 
Navigate by Thread:
Prev: Re: SoftIOC and Labview Ralph Lange via Tech-talk
Next: Re: SoftIOC and Labview Paul Sichta via Tech-talk
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  <20202021  2022  2023  2024 
ANJ, 27 May 2020 Valid HTML 4.01! · Home · News · About · Base · Modules · Extensions · Distributions · Download ·
· Search · EPICS V4 · IRMIS · Talk · Bugs · Documents · Links · Licensing ·