EPICS Controls Argonne National Laboratory

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  <20202021  2022  2023  2024  Index 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  <20202021  2022  2023  2024 
<== Date ==> <== Thread ==>

Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] RE: Timestamping Confusion
From: "Manoussakis, Adamandios via Tech-talk" <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov>
To: EPICS tech-talk <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 21:39:59 +0000
Hey Steven,

Currently we are using the caLab server to create a softIOC on the PXIe chassis.  Then we grab our data from the digitizer and do a caput(calab labview) into our softIOC waveform record.  I have not seen anything that is part of caLab that would allow us to write directly to the TIME field of the waveform record that is running on our caLab softIOC.  If anyone knows or has done this before that would be great.

-----Original Message-----
From: Hartman, Steven <hartmansm at ornl.gov> 
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2020 11:01 AM
To: Manoussakis, Adamandios <manoussakis1 at llnl.gov>
Cc: EPICS tech-talk <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] RE: Timestamping Confusion



> On Dec 16, 2020, at 1:21 PM, Manoussakis, Adamandios via Tech-talk <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov> wrote:
> 
> Currently we are using caLab implementation (so far works great for what we need which is to just put/get into PVs)


It sounds like you are using caLab as a CA client. caLab can also be used as a CA server (CaLabSoftIOC.vi). If you serve the PV from the labview side, you may be able to provide the time stamp to the record directly from your labview device support for your digitizer. And then propagate this time stamp to the other records via TSEL. 

-- 
Steven Hartman
hartmansm at ornl.gov




References:
Timestamping Confusion Manoussakis, Adamandios via Tech-talk
Re: Timestamping Confusion Michael Davidsaver via Tech-talk
RE: Timestamping Confusion Manoussakis, Adamandios via Tech-talk
Re: Timestamping Confusion Ralph Lange via Tech-talk
RE: Timestamping Confusion Manoussakis, Adamandios via Tech-talk
RE: Timestamping Confusion Manoussakis, Adamandios via Tech-talk
Re: Timestamping Confusion Johnson, Andrew N. via Tech-talk
RE: Timestamping Confusion Manoussakis, Adamandios via Tech-talk
Re: Timestamping Confusion Johnson, Andrew N. via Tech-talk
RE: Timestamping Confusion Manoussakis, Adamandios via Tech-talk
Re: Timestamping Confusion Ralph Lange via Tech-talk
RE: Timestamping Confusion Manoussakis, Adamandios via Tech-talk
Re: [EXTERNAL] RE: Timestamping Confusion Hartman, Steven via Tech-talk

Navigate by Date:
Prev: Re: [EXTERNAL] RE: Timestamping Confusion Hartman, Steven via Tech-talk
Next: Intended use of NTMultiChannel Paduan Donadio, Marcio via Tech-talk
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  <20202021  2022  2023  2024 
Navigate by Thread:
Prev: Re: [EXTERNAL] RE: Timestamping Confusion Hartman, Steven via Tech-talk
Next: Re: Timestamping Confusion Michael Davidsaver via Tech-talk
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  <20202021  2022  2023  2024 
ANJ, 16 Dec 2020 Valid HTML 4.01! · Home · News · About · Base · Modules · Extensions · Distributions · Download ·
· Search · EPICS V4 · IRMIS · Talk · Bugs · Documents · Links · Licensing ·