Donny,
You could change your calc record to this:
record(calc, "$(KEIT):CalcCurrent")
{
field(SCAN, "1 second")
field(INPA, "$(KEIT):Charge PP")
field(CALC, "LA-A")
}
This would subtract the new reading from the last reading.
—
Anthony Pietryla
Principal Controls Engineer
Advanced Photon Source
Argonne National Laboratory
Phone: 630-252-7430
Fax: 630-252-6123
On 3/29/21, 7:33 AM, "Tech-talk on behalf of Donny Domagoj Cosic via Tech-talk" <tech-talk-bounces at aps.anl.gov on behalf of tech-talk at aps.anl.gov> wrote:
Hi Marty and Mark,
Thank you for your quick response.
What Marty suggested makes sense. If the record is processes in INPA,
than of course INPB reads the same value from the Charge record. Thank
you for pointing that out.
However, when I corrected this error as you suggested, the result was
still always 0. Changing the order of NPP before PP should have solved
this problem but it didnt.
Using Marks suggestion of setting B to A after the calculation
("B-A;B:=A") works as expected and yields the correct result. This
solves my problem, but I still dont understand why Marty's suggestion
didnt work.
Thank you,
---
Donny Domagoj Cosic
Institut Ruđer Bošković, Bijenička cesta 54, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
Dana 29.03.2021 13:48, Smith, Martin via Tech-talk je napisao(la):
> Hi Donny,
>
> Because the Charge record is Passive scan and is being processed
> (presumably) only by
> the calc record what you are saying makes sense. the calc record
> processes the charge
> record first for link A using a PP link causing it to get a new
> value, then it gets that new
>
> value again using link B without processing (NPP) the charge record.
>
> I think what you really want is this:
>
> record(calc, "$(KEIT):CalcCurrent")
> {
> field(SCAN, "1 second")
> field(INPA, "$(KEIT):Charge NPP") # Get the current value of Charge
>
> field(INPB, "$(KEIT):Charge PP") # Process charge record then get the
> new value
> field(CALC, "B-A") # You may need to change this to A-B if you want a
> positive value assuming the charge is always increasing
> }
>
> You need to get the current value first then process the record to
> get the new value.
>
> Marty
>
> -------------------------
>
> FROM: Tech-talk <tech-talk-bounces at aps.anl.gov> on behalf of Donny
> Domagoj Cosic via Tech-talk <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov>
> SENT: Monday, March 29, 2021 6:35 AM
> TO: Tech-talk <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov>
> SUBJECT: Rate of change calculation
>
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to calculate the rate of change of a record using a calc
> record as follows:
>
> record(ai, "$(KEIT):Charge")
> {
> field(DESC, "Measure Charge")
> field(DTYP, "steam")
> field("@devKeithley6514.proto measureCharge() $(PORT)")
> field(SCAN, "Passive")
> }
>
> record(calc, "$(KEIT):CalcCurrent")
> {
> field(SCAN, "1 second")
> field(INPA, "$(KEIT):Charge PP")
> field(INPB, "$(KEIT):Charge NPP")
> field(CALC, "B-A")
> }
>
> The calc record always returns 0. If I change the calc to B+A, to
> check
> what is going on, I always get double the charge. It seems like the
> PP
> and NPP are both returning the same value even though the actual
> charge
> is changing. Any ideas on why this would be happening or suggestions
> would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Thank you in advance,
> Donny
>
> --
> Donny Domagoj Cosic
> Institut Ruđer Bošković, Bijenička cesta 54, 10000 Zagreb,
> Croatia
- Replies:
- Re: Rate of change calculation Johnson, Andrew N. via Tech-talk
- References:
- Rate of change calculation Donny Domagoj Cosic via Tech-talk
- Re: Rate of change calculation Smith, Martin via Tech-talk
- Re: Rate of change calculation Donny Domagoj Cosic via Tech-talk
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: CS-Studio Databrowser historical data display Kasemir, Kay via Tech-talk
- Next:
Re: Phoebus lock down BOB Kasemir, Kay via Tech-talk
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
<2021>
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: Rate of change calculation Donny Domagoj Cosic via Tech-talk
- Next:
Re: Rate of change calculation Johnson, Andrew N. via Tech-talk
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
<2021>
2022
2023
2024
|